SKILL.md

name: conventional-comments description: Write structured code review comments using Conventional Comments format. Use when reviewing PRs, writing code review feedback, or asked to "comment on this code" or "review this PR".

Conventional Comments

Write code review comments in Conventional Comments format (https://conventionalcomments.org).

Format

<label>[!] [(decorations)]: <subject>

[discussion]

Part	Required	Description
`label`	Yes	Comment type (see Labels below)
`!`	No	Blocking indicator—must resolve before approval
`(decoration)`	No	Comma-separated context tags (e.g., `(security)`)
`subject`	Yes	Main message (1 line)
`discussion`	No	Additional reasoning or suggested fix (1-3 lines)

Labels

Label	Description
`issue`	Identifies a problem that needs to be addressed.
`suggestion`	Proposes an improvement with an explicit change.
`todo`	Small, necessary change. Less severe than an issue.
`question`	Seeks clarification or investigation.
`note`	Information for the reader. Does not require action.
`typo`	Points out a typographical error.

Do NOT use: praise, nitpick, quibble — focus on actionable feedback only.

Decorations

Decoration	Use when
`(security)`	Comment relates to security vulnerabilities.
`(performance)`	Comment relates to performance impact.
`(a11y)`	Comment relates to accessibility.
`(ux)`	Comment relates to user experience.

Examples

Basic suggestion

suggestion: Consider using optional chaining here.

`user && user.profile && user.profile.name` can be simplified to `user?.profile?.name`.

Blocking issue

issue!: This function silently swallows exceptions.

Either log the error or propagate it to the caller.

With security decoration

suggestion! (security): User input should not be directly embedded in SQL.

Use prepared statements to prevent SQL injection.

With performance decoration

issue (performance): This query runs inside a loop causing N+1 problem.

Batch the IDs and fetch all records in a single query.

Simple todo

todo: Add null check before accessing `user.email`.

Question

question: Is this timeout value intentional?

300ms seems short for API calls that may span regions.

Note (informational)

note: This pattern is also used in `auth-service.ts:45`.

スコア

総合スコア

50/100

リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価

✓SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20

○LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

0/10

○説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10

○人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15

○最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10

○フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5

✓Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5

✓言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5

○タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

レビュー

💬

レビュー機能は近日公開予定です