← スキル一覧に戻る

review-documentation
by feather-lang
The core implementation of Feather
⭐ 9🍴 0📅 2026年1月19日
SKILL.md
name: review-documentation description: | Use this skill when asked to review the package documentation of the Go implementation of Feather.
Review Go Documentation
Review Go package documentation from a user's perspective, identifying gaps and areas for improvement.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- A package's public API documentation needs review
- Preparing documentation for a library release
- Evaluating whether docs are sufficient for new users
Process
- Run
go doc .to see the package overview - Run
go doc -all .to see all exported symbols - Adopt the user's perspective: Imagine you're a developer who just discovered this package and wants to use it
Checklist
Review documentation against these categories:
Essential Information
- Purpose: Is the package's purpose clear in one sentence?
- Quick Start: Can a user get something working in under 5 minutes?
- Core Types: Are the 2-3 most important types clearly identified?
- Thread Safety: Is concurrency behavior documented?
- Error Handling: How do errors propagate? What error types exist?
- Lifecycle: When to create, when to close, what happens to related objects?
API Clarity
- Similar Functions: Are distinctions between similar functions clear?
- Example:
RegistervsRegisterTypevsDefineType
- Example:
- Similar Types: Are related types differentiated?
- Example:
TypeDefvsForeignTypeDef
- Example:
- Constants: Are magic constants explained with context for when to use them?
- Unexplained Types: Does every exported type have a clear use case?
Practical Guidance
- Common Patterns: Are typical usage patterns shown?
- Anti-patterns: Are common mistakes warned against?
- Scope/Subset: If implementing a standard, what subset is covered?
- Limitations: What can't it do?
Internal vs Public
- Internal Types: Are internal-but-exported types clearly marked "do not use"?
- Stability: Is it clear which APIs are stable vs experimental?
Output Format
Provide findings in these sections:
## Critical (Users will be blocked without this)
- Issue 1
- Issue 2
## Important (Users will struggle without this)
- Issue 1
- Issue 2
## Nice to Have (Would improve experience)
- Issue 1
- Issue 2
## What's Good (Keep these)
- Strength 1
- Strength 2
Example Review
For a hypothetical database driver:
## Critical
- No mention of thread safety - can I share \*DB across goroutines?
- Close() documented but not what happens to active queries
## Important
- Query vs QueryRow vs QueryContext - when to use each?
- Error types not documented - how do I detect "connection lost"?
## Nice to Have
- Example of connection pooling configuration
- List of supported database versions
## What's Good
- Quick start example gets to working code fast
- Transaction API is well-explained with rollback semantics
スコア
総合スコア
60/100
リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価
✓SKILL.md
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
+20
✓LICENSE
ライセンスが設定されている
+10
○説明文
100文字以上の説明がある
0/10
○人気
GitHub Stars 100以上
0/15
○最近の活動
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
0/10
○フォーク
10回以上フォークされている
0/5
✓Issue管理
オープンIssueが50未満
+5
✓言語
プログラミング言語が設定されている
+5
○タグ
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
0/5
レビュー
💬
レビュー機能は近日公開予定です