← スキル一覧に戻る

verify-content
by dobachi
⭐ 1🍴 0📅 2026年1月18日
SKILL.md
name: verify-content description: Integrated skill for fact-checking and reference verification. Covers claim identification, source verification, and reference management. Use for document review, article proofreading, report verification, and academic paper checking.
Content Verification Skill
Provides an integrated workflow for ensuring content reliability.
Workflow Overview
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Step 1 │ │ Step 2 │ │ Step 3 │
│ Scan │ → │ Verify │ → │ Reference │
│ │ │ │ │ │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
See detailed guides:
- scan.md - Identify statements requiring verification
- verify.md - Verify facts with external sources
- reference.md - Manage references and citations
Quick Start
Run Full Workflow
User: Verify the content of this document
Run Specific Steps
User: Identify statements that need fact-checking in this article
User: Fact-check this numerical data
User: Organize the reference list
Step 1: Scan
Analyze the entire text to identify statements requiring verification.
Check Categories
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Factual statements | Historical facts, scientific facts, regulations |
| Quantitative claims | Numbers, statistics, dates, rankings |
| Definitive expressions | "always", "the only", "the largest" |
| Citations | Quotes, document references |
| Comparisons | "better than", "generally" |
Output Format
## Verification Targets
### Priority: High
| # | Statement | Type | Verification Needed |
|---|-----------|------|---------------------|
| 1 | "..." | Numerical | Verify source |
See scan.md for details.
Step 2: Verify
Verify identified statements using reliable external sources.
Verification Process
- Identify sources: Gather candidates via web search
- Retrieve actual content: Use WebFetch or curl to confirm
- Judge: Check consistency, accuracy, context, currency
Important: Don't Trust AI Search Results Blindly
# When WebFetch is blocked
curl -s -L "https://example.com/page" | head -200
# Check Wayback Machine for archived versions
curl -s "https://archive.org/wayback/available?url=example.com/page"
Verdict Criteria
| Verdict | Condition |
|---|---|
| ✅ Accurate | Confirmed by reliable source, content matches |
| ⚠️ Needs Revision | Mostly accurate but requires minor corrections |
| ❌ Incorrect | Contradicts facts or significantly misleading |
| ❓ Unverifiable | No reliable source found or inaccessible |
See verify.md for details.
Step 3: Reference
After verification, manage references according to project specifications.
Tasks
- Check project specifications: Citation style, placement
- Add to reference list: Register confirmed sources
- Add cross-references: Footnotes/inline/numbered references
Citation Format Examples
<!-- Footnote style -->
Japan's population is approximately 120 million[^1].
[^1]: Statistics Bureau of Japan "Population Estimates" 2024
<!-- Inline style -->
Japan's population is approximately 120 million (Statistics Bureau of Japan, 2024).
See reference.md for details.
Verifying Existing References
When the document already has references, also check:
Checklist
- Links are alive (no 404 errors)
- Cited content matches the source
- Citations are used in proper context
- Source information is current
Handling Broken Links
# Check status code
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://example.com/page"
# Get alternative URL from Wayback Machine
curl -s "https://archive.org/wayback/available?url=example.com/page"
Usage Examples
User: Verify the content of README.md and organize references
User: Check if the citations in this paper are correct
User: Verify the items identified in Issue #45
Output Report Format
# Content Verification Report
## Target File
- path/to/document.md
## Verification Summary
| Items | ✅ Accurate | ⚠️ Needs Revision | ❌ Incorrect | ❓ Unverifiable |
|-------|-------------|-------------------|--------------|-----------------|
| 10 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
## Detailed Results
[Verification results for each item...]
## Reference Management Status
- [ ] Reference list updated
- [ ] Cross-references added in text
- [ ] Links verified
スコア
総合スコア
60/100
リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価
✓SKILL.md
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
+20
✓LICENSE
ライセンスが設定されている
+10
○説明文
100文字以上の説明がある
0/10
○人気
GitHub Stars 100以上
0/15
○最近の活動
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
0/10
○フォーク
10回以上フォークされている
0/5
✓Issue管理
オープンIssueが50未満
+5
✓言語
プログラミング言語が設定されている
+5
○タグ
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
0/5
レビュー
💬
レビュー機能は近日公開予定です