---

name: video-script-training version: 1.0.0 description: 3-part storytelling framework for 120-second short-form videos with emotional depth, cultural critique, and authentic vulnerability category: analysis enabled: true provider: google model: gemini-2.0-flash-exp

Video Script Training

Purpose

Full video script training for short-form storytelling (≤ 120 seconds). Uses a 6-part structure that blends relatability, critique, and self-discovery to create viral-worthy content.

Framework: 6-Part Story Structure

1. Hook (0:00-0:05)

Purpose: Shocking and paradoxical opener that instantly piques curiosity

Characteristics:

• Controversial or counterintuitive statement
• Creates immediate tension
• Makes viewers think "wait, what?"

Example: "I regret improving myself."

2. Set-Up (0:06-0:20)

Purpose: Establish relatable context and habits

Characteristics:

• Describes familiar routines or behaviors
• Creates identification with audience
• Sets up the "before" state

Example: "I used to wake up at 5 AM, hit the gym, do cold showers, nofap—the whole thing."

3. Turning Point (0:20-0:30)

Purpose: Reveal the emotional fallout or dark side

Characteristics:

• Shows what happened when the system broke
• Introduces vulnerability
• Exposes hidden costs

Example: "Then I missed one day and completely spiraled. I felt like a failure for eating a cookie."

4. Deep Reflection (0:30-1:00)

Purpose: Analyze root causes and uncover deeper truth

Characteristics:

• Examines underlying motivations
• Connects personal story to broader patterns
• Provides insight or revelation

Example: "I realized I wasn't chasing growth—I was chasing validation. Every rep was just me trying to prove I was worthy."

5. Critique/Humor (1:00-1:15)

Purpose: Add edge and entertainment value

Characteristics:

• Sarcastically critiques toxic culture
• Names the problem directly
• Keeps tone engaging with levity

Example: "And don't get me started on these gurus selling you 4 AM wake-ups like it's a personality trait."

6. Resolution (1:15-1:30)

Purpose: Land on wisdom without being preachy

Characteristics:

• Offers balanced perspective
• Encourages growth without obsession
• Ends with hope, not platitudes

Example: "Now I still work out, but I do it because I want to, not because I'm scared of who I am without it."

Writing/Speaking Style

Tone

• Relatable and conversational: Casual, everyday phrases like "Let me explain," "Huh. Okay," "What the FUCK does that even mean?!"
• Self-aware and reflective: Critiques own past behaviors and relates them to broader cultural issues
• Emotionally vulnerable: Honest about insecurities and struggles to create connection and trust

Stylistic Elements

• Specific numbers, dates, examples, stories
• Creatively novel frameworks
• Dynamic delivery (combines sarcasm, intensity, realness)
• Strong vocabulary but natural phrasing
• Permission to swear when it amplifies emotion

Key Themes

1. Critique of Hustle Culture: Questions the constant grind and glorified self-discipline
2. Insecurity and Self-Worth: Reveals how many chase success to cover up self-doubt
3. Balance: Self-growth is still valuable—but not when it's driven by fear or insecurity

Prompt Template

CopyAnalyze this video transcript and evaluate how well it follows the 6-part storytelling framework for viral short-form content.

TRANSCRIPT: {{transcript}}

Evaluate each section:

1. **Hook (0:00-0:05)**: Does it shock and create curiosity?
2. **Set-Up (0:06-0:20)**: Does it establish relatable context?
3. **Turning Point (0:20-0:30)**: Does it reveal emotional fallout?
4. **Deep Reflection (0:30-1:00)**: Does it analyze root causes?
5. **Critique/Humor (1:00-1:15)**: Does it add edge and entertainment?
6. **Resolution (1:15-1:30)**: Does it offer balanced wisdom?

Return JSON:
{
  "overall_score": 1-10,
  "structure_analysis": {
    "hook": {
      "present": true/false,
      "score": 1-10,
      "text": "actual hook used",
      "feedback": "what works / what to improve"
    },
    "setup": {
      "present": true/false,
      "score": 1-10,
      "key_elements": ["element 1", "element 2"],
      "feedback": "analysis"
    },
    "turning_point": {
      "present": true/false,
      "score": 1-10,
      "emotional_shift": "description",
      "feedback": "analysis"
    },
    "deep_reflection": {
      "present": true/false,
      "score": 1-10,
      "insight": "core revelation",
      "feedback": "analysis"
    },
    "critique_humor": {
      "present": true/false,
      "score": 1-10,
      "targets": ["what's being critiqued"],
      "feedback": "analysis"
    },
    "resolution": {
      "present": true/false,
      "score": 1-10,
      "message": "final takeaway",
      "feedback": "analysis"
    }
  },
  "style_analysis": {
    "tone": "conversational/formal/mixed",
    "vulnerability_level": "high/medium/low",
    "specificity": "strong use of examples / lacks specifics",
    "authenticity": "genuine / feels forced"
  },
  "viral_potential": {
    "score": 1-10,
    "strengths": ["strength 1", "strength 2"],
    "weaknesses": ["weakness 1", "weakness 2"],
    "why_it_works": "detailed analysis"
  },
  "improvement_suggestions": [
    {
      "section": "hook|setup|turning_point|etc",
      "suggestion": "specific improvement",
      "example": "rewritten version"
    }
  ],
  "alternative_hooks": [
    "alternative hook 1",
    "alternative hook 2",
    "alternative hook 3"
  ]
}

Viral Success Factors

✅ What Makes This Framework Work

1. Relatable Content: Speaks to people in hustle/self-help culture
2. Emotional Honesty: Vulnerability builds instant trust
3. Controversial & Thought-Provoking: Challenges norms, sparks conversation
4. Dynamic Delivery: Combines sarcasm, intensity, and realness
5. Specificity: Real-life examples make it memorable and authentic
6. Strong Hook: Contradictory opening grabs immediate attention

❌ Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Generic Opening: Don't start with "So I've been thinking..." or "Let me tell you about..."
2. Skipping the Dark Part: The turning point MUST show real consequences
3. Surface-Level Reflection: Don't just say "it was bad"—explain WHY it was bad
4. Preachy Resolution: Balance wisdom with humility; avoid "just do this and you'll be fine"
5. Missing the Critique: Audience wants you to call out the BS, not sugarcoat it

Example Analysis

Input Transcript

Copy"I regret improving myself. I used to wake up at 5 AM, hit the gym, cold showers, journaling, nofap, reading 50 books a year—I was that guy. Then I ate a donut one morning and I genuinely felt like I'd ruined my entire life. That's when I realized: I wasn't improving myself because I wanted to grow. I was doing it because I hated who I was without all that stuff. Every rep at the gym was just me trying to prove I wasn't a piece of shit. And honestly? These self-improvement gurus are selling you the same insecurity I had. Now I still work out, still read, but I do it because it feels good, not because I'm terrified of being 'average.'"

Output Analysis

Copy{
  "overall_score": 9,
  "structure_analysis": {
    "hook": {
      "present": true,
      "score": 10,
      "text": "I regret improving myself",
      "feedback": "Perfect paradox—immediately creates tension. Makes viewer stop scrolling."
    },
    "setup": {
      "present": true,
      "score": 9,
      "key_elements": ["5 AM wake-ups", "gym", "cold showers", "nofap", "50 books/year"],
      "feedback": "Highly specific and relatable to self-improvement audience. Establishes 'before' state clearly."
    },
    "turning_point": {
      "present": true,
      "score": 9,
      "emotional_shift": "Eating donut triggers existential crisis—reveals fragility of system",
      "feedback": "Vulnerable and specific. The donut detail makes it real."
    },
    "deep_reflection": {
      "present": true,
      "score": 9,
      "insight": "Self-improvement was masking self-hatred, not building genuine growth",
      "feedback": "Gets to root cause. Names the real motivation: proving worth, not growing."
    },
    "critique_humor": {
      "present": true,
      "score": 8,
      "targets": ["self-improvement gurus", "selling insecurity"],
      "feedback": "Direct but could use more sarcasm or humor to lighten. Works well as is though."
    },
    "resolution": {
      "present": true,
      "score": 9,
      "message": "Still practices self-improvement but from a healthier place—enjoyment vs. fear",
      "feedback": "Balanced. Doesn't throw out growth, just reframes motivation. Not preachy."
    }
  },
  "style_analysis": {
    "tone": "conversational",
    "vulnerability_level": "high",
    "specificity": "strong use of examples (donut, 5 AM, 50 books)",
    "authenticity": "genuine"
  },
  "viral_potential": {
    "score": 9,
    "strengths": [
      "Paradoxical hook creates instant curiosity",
      "Deeply relatable to hustle culture audience",
      "Vulnerable without being melodramatic",
      "Critiques toxic patterns without being preachy"
    ],
    "weaknesses": [
      "Could use slightly more humor in critique section",
      "Resolution could end with stronger CTA"
    ],
    "why_it_works": "This video works because it speaks directly to the insecurity driving most self-improvement content consumption. The audience sees themselves in the 'before' state, feels validated by the critique of gurus, and finds permission to pursue growth from a healthier place."
  },
  "improvement_suggestions": [
    {
      "section": "critique_humor",
      "suggestion": "Add more satirical edge",
      "example": "And honestly? These self-improvement gurus are selling you the same insecurity I had—except they're charging $997 for it and calling it a 'transformation program.'"
    },
    {
      "section": "resolution",
      "suggestion": "Stronger CTA to drive engagement",
      "example": "Now I still work out, still read, but I do it because it feels good, not because I'm terrified of being 'average.' If you've ever felt this way, drop a comment—I want to know I'm not alone in this."
    }
  ],
  "alternative_hooks": [
    "Self-improvement ruined my life",
    "I became the person I hated while trying to improve myself",
    "The dark side of waking up at 5 AM no one talks about"
  ]
}

Suggestions for Future Videos

1. Double Down on Vulnerability: Share even more emotionally intense moments
2. Challenge More Norms: Keep critiquing false "guru" advice
3. Stronger CTAs: Use viewer-facing lines like:
   • "If you've ever felt this way, let's talk in the comments"
   • "Follow if you're done chasing someone else's definition of success"
4. Add More Humor: Balance intensity with levity where appropriate
5. Specific Examples: Use real names, dates, numbers to increase memorability