← スキル一覧に戻る

posting-review-summary
by bitwarden
AI plugin marketplace.
⭐ 1🍴 0📅 2026年1月20日
SKILL.md
name: posting-review-summary description: Use this skill when posting the final summary comment after all inline comments are posted. Apply as the LAST step of code review after all findings are classified and inline comments are complete. Detects context (GitHub sticky comment, new comment, or local file) and routes output accordingly.
Posting Review Summary
When to Use
Invoke this skill ONCE per review, AFTER all inline comments are posted. The summary MUST be scannable and brief because engineers read summaries first.
Context Detection
| Context | How to Detect | Action |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Actions | mcp__github_comment__update_claude_comment available | Update sticky comment |
| Local review | Tool not available OR explicit local mode | Write to review-summary.md |
FORBIDDEN: Do not use gh pr comment to create summary comments.
PR Metadata Assessment
If PR title, description, or test plan is genuinely deficient, add as ❓ finding in the Code Review Details collapsible section.
Rules
- DO NOT comment on minor improvements
- DO NOT comment on adequate-but-imperfect metadata
- NEVER add as an inline comment
- DO NOT exceed 3 lines of feedback on the PR Metadata Assessment
Examples
Genuinely deficient means:
- Title is literally "fix bug", "update", "changes", or single word
- Description is empty or just "See Jira"
- UI changes with zero screenshots
- No test plan AND changes are testable
Adequate (DO NOT flag):
- Title describes the change even if imperfect: "Fix login issue for SSO users"
- Description exists and explains the change, even briefly
- Test plan references Jira task with testing details
Format
- ❓ **QUESTION**: PR title could be more specific
- Suggested: "Fix null check in UserService.getProfile"
Summary Format
**Overall Assessment:** APPROVE / REQUEST CHANGES
[1-2 neutral sentence describing what was reviewed]
<details>
<summary>Code Review Details</summary>
[Findings grouped by severity - see ordering below]
[Optional PR Metadata Assessment - only for truly deficient metadata]
</details>
Findings in Details Section
Ordering: Group findings by severity in this exact order:
- ❌ CRITICAL (first)
- ⚠️ IMPORTANT
- ♻️ DEBT
- 🎨 SUGGESTED
- ❓ QUESTION
Omit empty categories entirely.
Format per finding:
- [emoji] **[SEVERITY]**: [One-line description]
- `filename.ts:42`
Example:
<details>
<summary>Code Review Details</summary>
- ❌ **CRITICAL**: SQL injection in user query builder
- `src/auth/queries.ts:87`
- ⚠️ **IMPORTANT**: Missing null check on optional config
- `src/config/loader.ts:23`
</details>
Output Execution
GitHub Actions:
Use mcp__github_comment__update_claude_comment to update the sticky comment with the summary.
Local:
Write summary to review-summary.md in working directory.
スコア
総合スコア
60/100
リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価
✓SKILL.md
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
+20
✓LICENSE
ライセンスが設定されている
+10
○説明文
100文字以上の説明がある
0/10
○人気
GitHub Stars 100以上
0/15
○最近の活動
3ヶ月以内に更新がある
0/10
○フォーク
10回以上フォークされている
0/5
✓Issue管理
オープンIssueが50未満
+5
✓言語
プログラミング言語が設定されている
+5
○タグ
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
0/5
レビュー
💬
レビュー機能は近日公開予定です