スキル一覧に戻る
aiskillstore

systematic-debugging

by aiskillstore

systematic-debuggingは、other分野における実用的なスキルです。複雑な課題への対応力を強化し、業務効率と成果の質を改善します。

102🍴 3📅 2026年1月23日
GitHubで見るManusで実行

SKILL.md


name: systematic-debugging description: Four-phase root cause investigation before attempting fixes. Use when debugging bugs, test failures, or unexpected behavior.

Systematic Debugging

ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.

When to Use

  • Encountering bugs or test failures
  • Unexpected behavior in code
  • Before proposing any fix

The Four Phases

Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation

Before proposing any solution:

  1. Read error messages thoroughly - Don't skip warnings or stack traces; they often contain exact solutions
  2. Reproduce consistently - Verify you can trigger the issue reliably with documented steps
  3. Check recent changes - Examine git diff, dependencies, and configuration modifications
  4. Gather diagnostic evidence - In multi-component systems, add instrumentation at component boundaries
  5. Trace data flow - Backward trace from the error to find where bad values originate

Phase 2: Pattern Analysis

Establish the pattern before fixing:

  1. Locate similar working code in the codebase
  2. Read reference implementations completely (not skimmed)
  3. List every difference between working and broken code
  4. Understand all dependencies and assumptions

Phase 3: Hypothesis Testing

Apply scientific method:

  1. State your hypothesis clearly: "I believe X is failing because Y, evidenced by Z"
  2. Test with the smallest possible change
  3. Change only ONE variable at a time
  4. Verify results before proceeding

Phase 4: Implementation

Fix the root cause systematically:

  1. Create a failing test case first (TDD)
  2. Implement a single fix addressing only the root cause
  3. Verify the fix resolves the issue without breaking other tests
  4. If fix doesn't work, return to Phase 1

Red Flags - STOP Immediately

  • Proposing fixes without understanding the issue
  • Attempting multiple simultaneous changes
  • Assuming problems without verification
  • Skipping evidence gathering
  • Making "quick fixes" before investigation

When 3+ Fixes Fail

STOP. This signals an architectural problem, not a fixable bug:

  1. Do not attempt another fix
  2. Return to Phase 1
  3. Question whether the underlying pattern/design is sound
  4. Ask: "Should we refactor architecture vs. continue fixing symptoms?"

Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues.

Results

Systematic approach: 15-30 minutes to resolution with 95% first-time success vs. Trial-and-error: 2-3 hours of thrashing with 40% success and new bugs introduced

スコア

総合スコア

60/100

リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

0/10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

+5
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新

+5
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

+5

レビュー

💬

レビュー機能は近日公開予定です