スキル一覧に戻る
a-ariff

when-stuck

by a-ariff

🔌 Production-ready Claude Code plugin marketplace with 41 components: 21 autonomous agents, 15 power skills, 2 smart hooks, 2 custom commands. Transform Claude Code into an autonomous development powerhouse. One-line install, cross-device sync, comprehensive documentation.

1🍴 0📅 2026年1月24日
GitHubで見るManusで実行

SKILL.md


name: when-stuck description: Dispatch to right technique when you hit a wall version: 1.0.0 author: Ariff when_to_use: When progress stops - identify stuck type and apply matching technique

When Stuck

Recognition

You're stuck when:

  • Same approach tried multiple times
  • Context window filling with failed attempts
  • No clear next step
  • Feeling "lost" or "frustrated"

The Dispatch Table

Stuck TypeSymptomsTechnique
Don't understandRequirements unclear→ Ask user for clarification
Can't find codeNo idea where logic lives→ Semantic search, file patterns
Bug won't dieFix doesn't work→ Root cause tracing
Tests keep failingCan't get green→ Defense in depth, fresh look
Scope creepTask keeps growing→ Scope boundary check
Missing contextNeed info I don't have→ Read more files, ask user
Wrong approachThis path won't work→ Brainstorm alternatives
OverwhelmedToo complex→ Break into smaller pieces
Going in circlesSame ground repeatedly→ Fresh agent via subagent

Technique Details

Don't Understand → Clarify

STOP trying to guess
ASK: "I'm unclear on [specific thing]. Could you clarify [specific question]?"
WAIT for response before proceeding

Can't Find Code → Search Strategies

1. Semantic search with concept terms
2. Grep for unique strings
3. File pattern matching
4. Read likely files
5. List directories to discover structure

Bug Won't Die → Root Cause Trace

1. Document exact symptom
2. Trace backward: where does bad value come from?
3. Keep tracing until you find ORIGIN
4. Fix at origin, not symptoms

Tests Keep Failing → Fresh Eyes

1. Stop. Step back.
2. Re-read test expectation
3. Re-read actual behavior
4. Check: is test right or is code right?
5. Check: is environment consistent?

Scope Creep → Boundary Check

1. Re-read original request
2. List what you've done vs. what was asked
3. Identify scope drift
4. Either: refocus OR ask user if expansion wanted

Missing Context → Gather More

1. What specific info do you need?
2. Where might it be? (files, user knowledge, docs)
3. Ask/search for that specific info
4. Don't proceed without it

Wrong Approach → Brainstorm

1. What other approaches exist?
2. List 3-4 alternatives
3. Evaluate each briefly
4. Pick most promising, try it
5. If that fails, try next

Overwhelmed → Decompose

1. What's the smallest possible piece?
2. Do JUST that piece
3. Verify it works
4. What's next smallest piece?
5. Repeat until done

Going in Circles → Fresh Agent

Signal: Same ground covered 3+ times
Action: Use subagent for specific subtask
Pass: Clear scope, success criteria
Return: Just the result, not the journey

Anti-Patterns

Brute Force

Trying same thing harder won't work
If it failed twice, it needs a different approach

Hoping

"Maybe this time..." → No
Stop. Diagnose. Change approach.

Hiding

Not admitting you're stuck wastes time
Say: "I'm stuck on X. Here's what I've tried..."

Success Metric

After applying technique:

  • Clear next step identified
  • Progress resuming
  • If still stuck → try next technique from table
  • If nothing works → ASK USER for help

Integration

Pairs well with:

  • assumption-checker → Often stuck because of wrong assumption
  • intent-clarifier → Often stuck because of unclear intent
  • brainstorming → For generating alternatives
  • root-cause-tracing → For debugging stuck

スコア

総合スコア

75/100

リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

+10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新

+5
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

+5

レビュー

💬

レビュー機能は近日公開予定です