
performance
by SylphxAI
ð AI development platform with MEP architecture - stop writing prompts, start building with 90% less typing
SKILL.md
name: performance description: Performance - Core Web Vitals, bundle size. Use when optimizing speed.
Performance Guideline
Tech Stack
- Framework: Next.js (SSR/ISR/Static)
- Platform: Vercel
- Tooling: Bun
Non-Negotiables
- Core Web Vitals must meet thresholds (LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms)
- Performance regressions must be detectable
Context
Performance is a feature. Slow products feel broken, even when they're correct. Users don't read loading spinners â they leave. Every 100ms of latency costs engagement.
Don't just measure â understand. Where does time go? What's blocking the critical path? What would make the product feel instant? Sometimes small architectural changes have bigger impact than optimization.
Driving Questions
- What makes the product feel slow to users?
- Where are the biggest bottlenecks in the critical user journeys?
- What's in the critical rendering path that shouldn't be?
- How large is the JavaScript bundle, and what's bloating it?
- What database queries are slow, and why?
- If we could make one thing 10x faster, what would have the most impact?
ã¹ã³ã¢
ç·åã¹ã³ã¢
ãªããžããªã®åè³ªææšã«åºã¥ãè©äŸ¡
SKILL.mdãã¡ã€ã«ãå«ãŸããŠãã
ã©ã€ã»ã³ã¹ãèšå®ãããŠãã
100æå以äžã®èª¬æããã
GitHub Stars 100以äž
3ã¶æä»¥å ã«æŽæ°ããã
10å以äžãã©ãŒã¯ãããŠãã
ãªãŒãã³Issueã50æªæº
ããã°ã©ãã³ã°èšèªãèšå®ãããŠãã
1ã€ä»¥äžã®ã¿ã°ãèšå®ãããŠãã
ã¬ãã¥ãŒ
ã¬ãã¥ãŒæ©èœã¯è¿æ¥å ¬éäºå®ã§ã

