
push-pr
by Positronic-Robotics
Python-native stack for real-life ML robotics
SKILL.md
name: push-pr description: Push current branch to origin and create a PR to upstream. Checks for uncommitted changes first.
Push and Create PR
This skill pushes the current branch to origin (fork) and creates a PR to upstream (main repo).
Workflow
-
Check for uncommitted changes
git status --porcelainIf there are changes, ask the user if they want to commit them first.
-
If committing, follow the commit style (see below), then continue.
-
Push to origin
git push -u origin HEAD -
Create PR to upstream
gh pr create --repo Positronic-Robotics/positronic --base main --head vertix:BRANCH_NAME \ --title "Title" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <bullet points describing the change> ## Test plan <how to test, or "Tested locally" if applicable> EOF )"
Commit Message Style
Follow the project's commit message conventions:
- CRITICAL: Never mention AI/Claude/assistant - no "Co-Authored-By" or AI attribution
- Keep messages concise - prefer one-line summary, use body only when necessary
- Short, imperative sentences (e.g., "Fix wrong type", "Add feature X")
- Use backticks for code references (e.g., "Unify
GrootActionDecoderandGrootObservationEncoder") - No trailing period for short messages
Good examples from this repo:
Avoid loading object dtype in SimpleSignalFix groot metadata so that lerobot dataset can work with multiple keys6D rotation representationUnify GR00T action decoding and observation encodingAdd chunked batching to migrate_remoteFix cfg/server.py imports and refactor dataset docstrings
What NOT to do:
- ❌ Don't list every single change in the message body
- ❌ Don't add "Co-Authored-By: Claude" or any AI attribution
- ❌ Don't use vague corporate-speak ("improve maintainability", "enhance code quality")
- ❌ Don't write multi-paragraph explanations in commit message
Analyzing Changes for PR
Important: Before writing the PR title and description:
-
Look at ALL commits on the branch (not just the latest):
git log main..HEAD --oneline -
Review the full diff from main:
git diff main...HEAD --stat -
Identify the MAJOR change - what is the primary purpose of this branch?
- Multiple small fixes supporting one feature = describe the feature
- Refactoring + new capability = focus on the new capability
- Don't list every small change; summarize the intent
-
Title should capture the major change, not enumerate commits
Remotes
| Remote | Repository | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
origin | vertix/positronic-open | Push branches here |
upstream | Positronic-Robotics/positronic | Create PRs here |
After PR Creation
Show the PR URL so user can review it.
Handling PR Review Comments
IMPORTANT: Analysis first, no code changes until approved.
When PR comments arrive (from bots or humans):
-
Fetch and display the comments:
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/pulls/NUMBER/comments -
Analyze each comment - provide opinion on:
- Is the concern valid?
- Does it apply to our use case?
- What's the priority (critical / nice-to-have / not applicable)?
- Is there context (previous commits, design decisions) that explains the current code?
-
Check conversation history - the code may be intentional:
- Look at relevant commits:
git show COMMIT_HASH - Check if there's reasoning in commit messages or code comments
- Consider the broader architecture and data flow
- Look at relevant commits:
-
Present findings to user - do NOT make code changes until user approves
-
If changes are needed, discuss the approach first, then implement
This prevents:
- Blindly "fixing" intentional design decisions
- Breaking working code based on misunderstood context
- Wasting time on changes that aren't needed
スコア
総合スコア
リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価
SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている
ライセンスが設定されている
100文字以上の説明がある
GitHub Stars 100以上
1ヶ月以内に更新
10回以上フォークされている
オープンIssueが50未満
プログラミング言語が設定されている
1つ以上のタグが設定されている
レビュー
レビュー機能は近日公開予定です


