---

name: flow-trace description: Trace data flow across files from source to sink. Use for cross-file taint analysis, understanding how user input reaches dangerous sinks, and documenting vulnerability paths.

Flow Trace Skill

Purpose

Trace data flow from source (user input) to sink (dangerous function) across multiple files. Outputs structured flow_edges for visualization and documentation.

When to Use

• After finding a potential vulnerability, trace the full path
• Understanding how user input reaches a dangerous sink
• Documenting the attack path for a finding
• Verifying if a source can actually reach a sink

Input Requirements

Provide either:

1. Starting point: Source file and function/variable
2. Ending point: Sink file and function
3. Both: For verifying connectivity

Output Format

Output flow edges in this structure:

Copyflow_edges:
  - from_file: "src/routes/api.rs"
    from_line: 45
    from_symbol: "request.params['id']"
    to_file: "src/routes/api.rs"
    to_line: 48
    to_symbol: "get_user(id)"
    kind: taint
    notes: "User input passed to function"

  - from_file: "src/routes/api.rs"
    from_line: 48
    from_symbol: "get_user(id)"
    to_file: "src/db/users.rs"
    to_line: 23
    to_symbol: "User::find(id)"
    kind: dataflow
    notes: "Function call crosses file boundary"

  - from_file: "src/db/users.rs"
    from_line: 23
    from_symbol: "User::find(id)"
    to_file: "src/db/users.rs"
    to_line: 25
    to_symbol: "db.query(format!(...))"
    kind: taint
    notes: "SINK: Unsanitized input in SQL query"

Flow Edge Types

Tracing Process

1. Identify Source

CopyCommon sources:
- HTTP request parameters, body, headers
- File uploads (filename, content)
- Database values (stored attacks)
- Environment variables
- WebSocket messages
- Command line arguments

2. Follow Transformations

CopyTrack through:
- Variable assignments: let x = source
- Function parameters: foo(source)
- Return values: return process(source)
- Object properties: obj.field = source
- Array operations: arr.push(source)

3. Cross File Boundaries

CopyLook for:
- Function calls to other modules
- Imports/requires
- Class inheritance
- Trait implementations
- Interface method calls

4. Identify Sinks

CopyDangerous sinks by type:
- SQL: db.query(), db.execute(), raw SQL
- Command: system(), exec(), spawn()
- XSS: innerHTML, document.write()
- File: open(), readFile(), writeFile()
- SSRF: http.get(url), fetch(url)

Example Trace

Starting Point

CopyFile: src/api/users.rs:15
Symbol: request.query("id")

Trace Output

Copyflow_edges:
  - from_file: "src/api/users.rs"
    from_line: 15
    from_symbol: "request.query('id')"
    to_file: "src/api/users.rs"
    to_line: 16
    to_symbol: "id"
    kind: taint
    notes: "Query param extracted"

  - from_file: "src/api/users.rs"
    from_line: 16
    from_symbol: "id"
    to_file: "src/api/users.rs"
    to_line: 18
    to_symbol: "UserService::get(id)"
    kind: dataflow
    notes: "Passed to service layer"

  - from_file: "src/api/users.rs"
    from_line: 18
    from_symbol: "UserService::get(id)"
    to_file: "src/services/user.rs"
    to_line: 42
    to_symbol: "UserRepository::find(id)"
    kind: dataflow
    notes: "Service delegates to repository"

  - from_file: "src/services/user.rs"
    from_line: 42
    from_symbol: "UserRepository::find(id)"
    to_file: "src/db/repository.rs"
    to_line: 78
    to_symbol: "db.execute(query)"
    kind: taint
    notes: "SINK: SQL execution"

summary: "User input from query param flows through 4 hops to SQL sink"
sink_type: "SQL Injection"
sanitization_found: false

Summary Format

After tracing, provide:

Copysummary: "<source> -> ... (<N> hops) -> <sink>"
sink_type: "SQL Injection|Command Injection|XSS|Path Traversal|SSRF|..."
sanitization_found: true|false
sanitization_notes: "Input validated at step 2 with regex"

Tips for Effective Tracing

1. Start broad, narrow down: First identify all call sites, then trace specific paths
2. Watch for sanitization: Note if/where input is validated or escaped
3. Track transformations: URL decode, base64, JSON parse can bypass filters
4. Check error paths: Error handlers often have different (weaker) validation
5. Follow async flows: Callbacks, promises, async/await can obscure data flow

KYCo Integration

After tracing a vulnerability path, register the finding and flow edges:

1. Check Active Project

Copykyco project list

2. Create Finding with Taint Path

Copykyco finding create \
  --title "SQL Injection via user ID parameter" \
  --project PROJECT_ID \
  --severity high \
  --cwe CWE-89 \
  --attack-scenario "User input flows from request.params['id'] through 4 hops to db.query() without sanitization"

3. Import SARIF/Semgrep Results (if available)

Copy# Import from security scanner output
kyco finding import semgrep-results.json --project PROJECT_ID

# Auto-detect format
kyco finding import scan-results.sarif --project PROJECT_ID

4. View Flow in Kanban

The KYCo GUI Kanban board visualizes flow traces. Open with:

Copykyco gui

Then click on a finding to see the SOURCE → intermediate → SINK flow graph.