スキル一覧に戻る
Lobbi-Docs

jira-issue-triage-and-routing

by Lobbi-Docs

1🍴 0📅 2026年1月24日
GitHubで見るManusで実行

SKILL.md


name: Jira Issue Triage and Routing description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage issue", "classify ticket", "route jira", "analyze priority", "categorize issue", "determine complexity", "route to agents", or needs guidance on classifying, prioritizing, and routing Jira issues to appropriate agents and workflows. version: 1.0.0 trigger_phrases:

  • "triage issue"
  • "classify ticket"
  • "route jira"
  • "analyze priority"
  • "categorize issue"
  • "determine complexity"
  • "assess severity"
  • "route to agents"
  • "triage workflow"
  • "issue classification" categories: ["jira", "triage", "routing", "classification", "prioritization"]

Jira Issue Triage and Routing Skill

Intelligent classification, prioritization, and routing system for Jira issues.

Triage Decision Tree

START: New Jira Issue
├─ Step 1: ISSUE TYPE CLASSIFICATION
│  ├─ Bug? → Classify severity (Blocker/Critical/Major/Minor) → HIGH Priority if Critical
│  ├─ Story/Feature? → Check requirements clarity, sprint scope, dependencies
│  ├─ Epic? → Route to epic-decomposer (NEVER implement directly)
│  ├─ Task? → Route by category (Tech Debt/Config/Docs/Infrastructure)
│  └─ Spike? → Time-box (1-2 days max) → Document findings → Create stories
│
├─ Step 2: COMPLEXITY ASSESSMENT (0-100 scale)
│  ├─ Code Impact: Single file (2) → Multiple services (10)
│  ├─ Integration: None (0) → Multiple external APIs (10)
│  ├─ Risk: None (0) → Critical/Data loss (10)
│  ├─ Testing: No tests (0) → Complex E2E scenarios (10)
│  ├─ Dependencies: None (0) → Multiple blocking (10)
│  └─ Uncertainty: Known (0) → Complete unknown (10)
│
│  Scoring: (Code×0.25 + Integration×0.20 + Risk×0.20 + Testing×0.15 + Dependencies×0.10 + Uncertainty×0.10) × 10
│
│  Categories:
│  • 1-20: SIMPLE → Quick-Fix Path (2-3 agents, 2-4 hrs)
│  • 21-40: MODERATE → Standard Workflow (3-5 agents, 2-5 days)
│  • 41-70: COMPLEX → Extended Workflow (5-10 agents, 5-10 days)
│  • 71+: VERY COMPLEX → Decomposition Path
│
├─ Step 3: PRIORITY & SEVERITY ASSESSMENT
│  ├─ Business Impact: Blocks production (BLOCKER) → Nice-to-have (LOW)
│  ├─ Urgency: Immediate (hours) → Backlog (months)
│  └─ Bug Severity Matrix:
│     • BLOCKER: Production down, data loss, security breach (1-4 hr SLA)
│     • CRITICAL: Major functionality broken (4-8 hr SLA)
│     • MAJOR: Important feature degraded (1-3 days)
│     • MINOR: Cosmetic issues (next sprint)
│
├─ Step 4: WORKFLOW ROUTING
│  ├─ QUICK-FIX: Simple (1-20), <50 LOC, low risk → EXPLORE→CODE→TEST→COMMIT
│  ├─ STANDARD: Moderate (21-40) → EXPLORE→PLAN→CODE→TEST→FIX→COMMIT
│  ├─ EXTENDED: Complex (41-70), high risk → All phases + extended thinking + checkpoints
│  ├─ RESEARCH: Spike/POC → RESEARCH→DOCUMENT→CREATE STORIES (time-boxed)
│  └─ DECOMPOSITION: Epic (71+) → ANALYZE→DECOMPOSE→CREATE STORIES→TRIAGE EACH
│
├─ Step 5: AGENT SELECTION
│  ├─ By Type: Bug→debugger; Story→feature-architect; Epic→epic-decomposer; Spike→research-specialist
│  ├─ By Tech: Frontend→react-specialist; Backend→nodejs/python/java-specialist; DevOps→k8s-specialist
│  ├─ By Phase: EXPLORE→code-analyst; PLAN→architect; CODE→tech-specific; TEST→test-engineer; COMMIT→git-specialist
│  └─ By Complexity: SIMPLE→2-3 junior agents; COMPLEX→5-10 seniors + extended thinking
│
├─ Step 6: RISK & ESCALATION
│  ├─ Risk Factors: Security, breaking changes, data migrations, compliance issues
│  ├─ Level 1 (IMMEDIATE STOP): Security vulnerability, data loss, compliance breach
│  ├─ Level 2 (CHECKPOINT): Complexity +50%, blocker >4hrs, breaking changes
│  └─ Level 3 (POST-COMPLETION): Standard bugs, docs, minor refactoring
│
└─ Step 7: OUTPUT ROUTING PACKAGE
   ├─ Classification, complexity score, priority, workflow path
   ├─ Agent selection, risk assessment, escalation triggers
   └─ Update Jira labels, assign workflow, spawn agents

Issue Type Routing Matrix

TypeDetectionRoutingAgents
BugTitle: "bug", "broken", "error"; Stack trace presentRoute by severity + "Can reproduce?" checkbug-fixer, debugger, root-cause-investigator
Story"Add", "implement", "create"; User story formatCheck requirements, sprint scope, decompose if >13 ptsrequirements-analyzer, feature-architect, tech-specialists
EpicType=Epic; Multi-sprint scopeDECOMPOSE into 3-8 stories (Foundation→Core→Enhancement→Polish phases)epic-decomposer, strategic-planner
TaskNo user-facing changeTech Debt→code-quality; Config→devops; Docs→doc-writerdomain-specialists
Spike"Investigate", "research", "POC"; Unknown outcomeTime-box 1-2 days, document findings, create storiesresearch-specialist, poc-developer

Complexity Scoring Example

Issue: Add CSV export functionality

Code Impact: 5 (3-4 files, 200-300 LOC) × 0.25 = 1.25
Integration: 3 (internal APIs) × 0.20 = 0.60
Risk: 4 (file generation, perf) × 0.20 = 0.80
Testing: 6 (unit + integration) × 0.15 = 0.90
Dependencies: 2 (DB query opt) × 0.10 = 0.20
Uncertainty: 3 (format details) × 0.10 = 0.30

Score: 3.65 × 10 = 36.5 → MODERATE (5 story points)
→ Standard Workflow, 3-5 agents, 2-5 days

Epic Decomposition Example

Epic: User Management System

Phase 1 (Sprint 1): PROJ-101 Profile CRUD (5pts), PROJ-102 RBAC (8pts), PROJ-103 Password Policy (3pts)
Phase 2 (Sprint 2): PROJ-104 Audit Logging (5pts), PROJ-105 MFA (8pts)
Phase 3 (Sprint 3): PROJ-106 Bulk Ops (5pts), PROJ-107 Import/Export (5pts)
Phase 4 (Sprint 4): PROJ-108 Analytics (8pts)

Dependencies: PROJ-102 blocks PROJ-106; PROJ-101 blocks PROJ-104
Total: 8 stories, 47 points, 4 sprints, 2-3 developers

Workflow Paths

PathCriteriaPhasesAgentsDuration
Quick-FixComplexity 1-20, <50 LOC, low riskEXPLORE→CODE→TEST→COMMIT2-32-4 hrs
StandardComplexity 21-40, moderate riskEXPLORE→PLAN→CODE→TEST→FIX→COMMIT3-52-5 days
ExtendedComplexity 41-70, high riskAll phases + extended thinking + checkpoints5-135-10 days
ResearchSpike/POC, time-boxedRESEARCH→DOCUMENT→CREATE STORIES1-31-5 days
DecompositionEpic, complexity 71+ANALYZE→DECOMPOSE→CREATE STORIES→TRIAGE2-41-2 days

Agent Selection by Phase

PhaseSIMPLEMODERATECOMPLEXVERY COMPLEX
EXPLOREcode-analyst (1)code-analyst, requirements-analyzer (2)code-analyst, dep-mapper, architect (3)architect, senior-analyst (3)
PLANfeature-architect (1)feature-architect, code-architect (2)senior-architect (2)
CODEjunior-dev (1-2)tech-specialists (2-4)tech-specialists (3-6)senior-specialists (4-6)
TESTtest-runner (1)test-engineer (1-2)test-engineer, qa-specialist (2-3)comprehensive-tester (2-4)
FIXdebugger (1)debugger, refactoring-specialist (1-2)senior-debugger (1-2)
COMMITgit-specialist (1)git-specialist (1)git-specialist, doc-writer (1-2)git-specialist, doc-writer (1-2)

Escalation Matrix

TriggerLevelActionTimelineNotify
Security vulnerability1 IMMEDIATESTOP work, create incidentImmediateSecurity, management
Data loss risk1 IMMEDIATESTOP work, documentImmediateOps, management
Complexity +50%2 CHECKPOINTPause, request decisionSame dayTech lead, product owner
Blocker >4 hrs2 CHECKPOINTEscalate blockerWithin 4 hrsBlocking team, manager
Breaking change2 CHECKPOINTDocument impact, approve1-2 daysAffected teams
Standard bug fix3 POST-COMPLETIONComplete, notifyAfter doneReviewer

Bug Routing Decision

Bug Detected
├─ Can reproduce consistently? NO → Gather reproduction steps
├─ Security vulnerability? YES → IMMEDIATE ESCALATION
├─ Severity?
│  ├─ BLOCKER/CRITICAL → Extended workflow, root-cause analysis, human checkpoints
│  ├─ MAJOR → Standard workflow, add regression tests
│  └─ MINOR → Quick-Fix path, batch with similar fixes
└─ Root cause known? NO → Extend EXPLORE phase with debugger/profiler

Feature Routing Decision

Story/Feature Detected
├─ Requirements clear? NO → Route to requirements-analyzer first
├─ Single sprint scope? NO → Consider epic decomposition
├─ Tech complexity?
│  ├─ Frontend → UI specialists
│  ├─ Backend → API specialists
│  ├─ Full-stack → Both
│  └─ Infrastructure → DevOps specialists
├─ Integration complexity?
│  ├─ None → SIMPLE (1-20 pts)
│  ├─ Internal APIs → MODERATE (21-40 pts)
│  ├─ External APIs → COMPLEX (41-70 pts)
│  └─ Multiple external → VERY COMPLEX (71+ pts)
└─ Score 1-100 and route to appropriate workflow

Spike Handling

Spike Detected
├─ Time-Box Definition (CRITICAL)
│  ├─ Small: 1 day max
│  ├─ Medium: 2-3 days max
│  └─ Large: 1 week max (justify)
├─ Research Phase: Investigate tech/approach, build POC if needed
├─ Document Phase: Write findings, recommend approach, estimate effort
└─ Output: Go/No-Go decision OR implementation stories with estimates

Triage Output Checklist

  • Issue classification (type, subtype, confidence)
  • Complexity score (0-100) with factor breakdown
  • Priority & severity assessment
  • Workflow path selection (Quick-Fix/Standard/Extended/Research/Decomposition)
  • Agent recommendations per phase
  • Risk assessment and escalation level
  • Dependencies and blockers
  • Jira labels and field updates
  • Execute workflow with selected agents

スコア

総合スコア

60/100

リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

+10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

0/10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

+5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

レビュー

💬

レビュー機能は近日公開予定です