スキル一覧に戻る
Coowoolf

pre-mortem-framework

by Coowoolf

105 Product Management Skills extracted from Lenny's Podcast - For use with Claude Code / Cursor / Windsurf

1🍴 0📅 2026年1月24日
GitHubで見るManusで実行

SKILL.md


name: Pre-Mortem Framework description: Instead of waiting for a post-mortem after failure, imagine the project has already failed spectacularly and work backward to uncover hidden risks. Use before kicking off any major initiative, product launch, or high-stakes project.

The Pre-Mortem Framework

"If you do a pre-mortem right, you will not have to do an ugly post-mortem." — Shreyas Doshi

What It Is

Instead of waiting for a post-mortem after a failure, the team imagines the project has already failed spectacularly in the future and works backward to determine why. This uncovers hidden risks that polite corporate culture usually suppresses.

When To Use

  • Before kicking off any major initiative
  • Prior to product launch or high-stakes project
  • When team has optimism bias or is avoiding hard conversations
  • To create psychological safety for voicing concerns

Core Principles

1. The Prompt

Start by stating: "Imagine it is 6 months from now and this project has failed miserably."

2. Categorize Risks

TypeDescription
🐯 TigersFatal threats that can kill the project
📄 Paper TigersPerceived but fake threats (fear without substance)
🐘 ElephantsUnspoken truths everyone avoids discussing

3. Cross-Team Voting

Have team members vote on the scariest tiger identified by someone else — this surfaces risks without political defensiveness.

How To Apply

STEP 1: Set the Scene (5 min)
└── "It's 6 months from now. This project failed spectacularly."
└── "What went wrong?"

STEP 2: Silent Brainstorm (10 min)
└── Each person writes 3-5 failure scenarios
└── No discussion during writing

STEP 3: Share & Categorize (15 min)
└── Read aloud and tag as Tiger/Paper Tiger/Elephant
└── Group similar themes

STEP 4: Vote (5 min)
└── Each person votes on TOP 2 scariest Tigers
└── RULE: You cannot vote for your own

STEP 5: Action Plan (15 min)
└── For each top Tiger: assign owner and mitigation

Common Mistakes

❌ Treating it as a standard risk assessment without the "imagined failure" prompt

❌ Allowing senior leaders to dominate discussion (kills psychological safety)

❌ Not following up on identified risks post-session

Real-World Example

Shreyas used this at Stripe for major launches to surface "elephants"—like questioning if a PR splash would actually result in sustained user adoption.


Source: Shreyas Doshi, Lenny's Podcast

スコア

総合スコア

55/100

リポジトリの品質指標に基づく評価

SKILL.md

SKILL.mdファイルが含まれている

+20
LICENSE

ライセンスが設定されている

0/10
説明文

100文字以上の説明がある

+10
人気

GitHub Stars 100以上

0/15
最近の活動

3ヶ月以内に更新がある

0/10
フォーク

10回以上フォークされている

0/5
Issue管理

オープンIssueが50未満

+5
言語

プログラミング言語が設定されている

0/5
タグ

1つ以上のタグが設定されている

0/5

レビュー

💬

レビュー機能は近日公開予定です